Per Gulenko.
Are dialectic thinkers inclined to need a tie-breaker? Like when things are too balanced, say two directions following a decision are judged by them as equally possible and beneficial, then would they be inclined to need a tie-breaker? How'd they break the tie alone or do they necessarily need outside input?
Are dialectic thinkers inclined to need a tie-breaker? Like when things are too balanced, say two directions following a decision are judged by them as equally possible and beneficial, then would they be inclined to need a tie-breaker? How'd they break the tie alone or do they necessarily need outside input?