In for example ESI-LIE the Fe of LIE is more apparent. Its like ESI just do not do the Fe to a greater extent while LIE actually rely more of it to keep positive/neutral relationship with people in their environment. Same with EII who create strong one on one connections but can be totally awkward, maybe even displaying how much they do not value Fe. The LSE however have some Fe going at most times if even only for communication lubricant.
Brings the question, in this theoretical dual relationship does the LIE bring the Fe to the table?
Brings the question, in this theoretical dual relationship does the LIE bring the Fe to the table?