Look at an everyday object and write about it for only 5 minutes. See what it reveals about yourself.
Words on the label: Verbal thinking 1.09
Colors and text: Visual sensitivity 1.09
Bottle contents: Functional thinking 3.83
The bottle itself: Tactile sensitivity 6.01
Light and shadow: ontextual thinking 0.00
Words on the label: Verbal thinking. People who score high on this dimension tend to focus on the label and what the words actually say. They often report that the letters Oza and Ka referred to Ozarka and that "Thirst Quencher" could be seen on the blue background. Your score is about average. You probably mentioned a couple of the broad features of the words on the label but didn't dwell on them.
Colors and text: Visual sensitivity. Some people are particularly sensitive to colors and styles associated with writing. People who score high on the visual sensitivity dimension tend to write about colors of the text as well as the backgrounds. Your score on this dimension is below the average. You may be interested in what words say but not how they are presented. Graphic design may not be a wise career choice.
Bottle contents: Functional thinking. The purpose of a water bottle is to hold water. Duh. People who score high on this dimension focus on the bottle as a container of something. In other words, they are thinking about the function of the bottle. Your language use in describing the bottle suggests that you are someone who thinks about the functions of objects. When you looked at the picture, your eyes probably wandered to the contents of the bottle. Most people didn't do this. Perhaps you have deep philosophical thoughts. Perhaps you are an aspiring engineer. Perhaps you are thirsty.
The bottle itself: Tactile sensitivity. Someone who is high in tactile sensitivity likes to touch things. They appreciate the surface, texture, and contours of objects and people. They have an appreciation of the dimensionality of objects. In describing the bottle, high scorers paid attention to the surface and contour of the bottle itself, perhaps thinking of it like a sculpture. Your writing suggests a true appreciation of form, depth, and touch. In looking at the bottle, you tend to see it as a living object. You can imagine it in your hand with an awareness of its surface and contour. You may be a sensual person who appreciates the complexity of objects and people. You may also have a fetish for bottles.
Light and shadow: Contextual thinking. If you look closely at the picture of the bottle, you will see that the lighting casts a shadow on the table through the bottle. People who wrote about this tended to score highly on this dimension. As you can see in the table, your score indicates that you are below average in contextual thinking. That is, the way you described the bottle tended to overlook the way the bottle was oriented on the table relative to the light and the background. People low in contextual thinking tend to view the bottle as an object on its own. This may signal a difficulty in adopting a broad perspective. At least a broad perspective on visual arrays. Perhaps you should not be a lighting director for movies.
Colors and text: Visual sensitivity 1.09
Bottle contents: Functional thinking 3.83
The bottle itself: Tactile sensitivity 6.01
Light and shadow: ontextual thinking 0.00
Words on the label: Verbal thinking. People who score high on this dimension tend to focus on the label and what the words actually say. They often report that the letters Oza and Ka referred to Ozarka and that "Thirst Quencher" could be seen on the blue background. Your score is about average. You probably mentioned a couple of the broad features of the words on the label but didn't dwell on them.
Colors and text: Visual sensitivity. Some people are particularly sensitive to colors and styles associated with writing. People who score high on the visual sensitivity dimension tend to write about colors of the text as well as the backgrounds. Your score on this dimension is below the average. You may be interested in what words say but not how they are presented. Graphic design may not be a wise career choice.
Bottle contents: Functional thinking. The purpose of a water bottle is to hold water. Duh. People who score high on this dimension focus on the bottle as a container of something. In other words, they are thinking about the function of the bottle. Your language use in describing the bottle suggests that you are someone who thinks about the functions of objects. When you looked at the picture, your eyes probably wandered to the contents of the bottle. Most people didn't do this. Perhaps you have deep philosophical thoughts. Perhaps you are an aspiring engineer. Perhaps you are thirsty.
The bottle itself: Tactile sensitivity. Someone who is high in tactile sensitivity likes to touch things. They appreciate the surface, texture, and contours of objects and people. They have an appreciation of the dimensionality of objects. In describing the bottle, high scorers paid attention to the surface and contour of the bottle itself, perhaps thinking of it like a sculpture. Your writing suggests a true appreciation of form, depth, and touch. In looking at the bottle, you tend to see it as a living object. You can imagine it in your hand with an awareness of its surface and contour. You may be a sensual person who appreciates the complexity of objects and people. You may also have a fetish for bottles.
Light and shadow: Contextual thinking. If you look closely at the picture of the bottle, you will see that the lighting casts a shadow on the table through the bottle. People who wrote about this tended to score highly on this dimension. As you can see in the table, your score indicates that you are below average in contextual thinking. That is, the way you described the bottle tended to overlook the way the bottle was oriented on the table relative to the light and the background. People low in contextual thinking tend to view the bottle as an object on its own. This may signal a difficulty in adopting a broad perspective. At least a broad perspective on visual arrays. Perhaps you should not be a lighting director for movies.
It is a plastic bottle, several inches high and made of a clear substance. It gives when squeezed, and will produce a crinkling sound, but is not easy to fully smash. The top has a cap of white plastic. This lid is only about a fourth-inch high and screws on and off the clear plastic bottle, with ridges along its edge to aid in the twisting. A think plastic ring below this cap shows that the cap had been firmly connected before being removed. But it was removed, and the water is gone. But the cap was replaced on the bottle which now contains mostly air. Around the bottle, about 2/3 up and right before said bottle tapers to the lid (which is only about an inch wide) is a red label saying the company that bottled the water and other information regarding what had been a bottle of water. The print is too small for me to read it from this distance, but it seems they were able to think of a lot to say about their particular version of water.