It is obvious that there are lots of IEE in journalism. You hear them on the radio, read their articles in the newspaper etc.
I think IEE are good reporters. The problem is that they don't only do that. They also write columns where they "analyse" current affairs, or express their opinion.
If you are a journalist you get lots of opportunities to express your view, not only reporting.
They lock themselves into a certain ideology, and then everything is analyzed according to that.
I am just getting really tired of this. I turn on the radio and hear yet another IEE telling their personal opinion under then veil of "reporting"
This wouldn't be so much of a problem if journalism wasn't packed with IEE. But too much is too much.
I do think that the lack of :Ti: in journalism is a problem.
Thoughts?
I think IEE are good reporters. The problem is that they don't only do that. They also write columns where they "analyse" current affairs, or express their opinion.
If you are a journalist you get lots of opportunities to express your view, not only reporting.
They lock themselves into a certain ideology, and then everything is analyzed according to that.
I am just getting really tired of this. I turn on the radio and hear yet another IEE telling their personal opinion under then veil of "reporting"
This wouldn't be so much of a problem if journalism wasn't packed with IEE. But too much is too much.
I do think that the lack of :Ti: in journalism is a problem.
Thoughts?