This is not MBTI. Stop using their confusing and incorrect notation.
Below is logically consistant notation.
Sensation/Intuition (S/I)
Logic/Ethics (L/E)
Introversion/Extraversion (-/+)*
Demensions (# 1-4)
[Valued] / (Unvalued) functions
Irrational/Rational & Perception/Judgement (J/P)
Conscious/Unconscious (C/U)
Examples
Te -> L+
4D Te -> L+4
SiTe -> S-L+
LSE -> LS+
Intuitive Logical Extravert, Extraverted Subtype
ILE-Ne -> IL+
Intuitive Logical Extravert, Introverted Subtype
ILE-Ti -> IL+-
Model R
Add up the numbers in each block
-1+2=1
-3+4=1
-3+4=1
-1+2=1
IL+ is extraverted because all the functions in the block add up to 1, which we know is extraverted because we defined extraversion as +(1). How cool is that?
*E/I needs to be changed to +/- to avoid confusion with S/I.
Below is logically consistant notation.
Sensation/Intuition (S/I)
Logic/Ethics (L/E)
Introversion/Extraversion (-/+)*
Demensions (# 1-4)
[Valued] / (Unvalued) functions
Irrational/Rational & Perception/Judgement (J/P)
Conscious/Unconscious (C/U)
Examples
Te -> L+
4D Te -> L+4
SiTe -> S-L+
LSE -> LS+
Intuitive Logical Extravert, Extraverted Subtype
ILE-Ne -> IL+
Intuitive Logical Extravert, Introverted Subtype
ILE-Ti -> IL+-
Model R
Code:
Type: IL+
Introversion | Extraversion
E1 | S2 (Super-Ego)
Conscious L3 | I4 [Ego]
----------------|-----------------
Unconscious I3 | L4 (Id)
S1 | E2 [Super-Id]-1+2=1
-3+4=1
-3+4=1
-1+2=1
IL+ is extraverted because all the functions in the block add up to 1, which we know is extraverted because we defined extraversion as +(1). How cool is that?
*E/I needs to be changed to +/- to avoid confusion with S/I.