Hello,
I've been thinking of the use of this dichotomy lately, and the more I think about it the less I can make sense out of it. I haven't found much about its origin around, and given that it basically builds up the entire Model system, I'd be curious to gather something more out of it. Static/ Dynamic functions. Anyone got any ideas?
Just to try and reorganize the ideas a little: Static are the types that have either :Se:, :Ne:, :Ti: and :Fi: in their consciousness, dynamics are the types that use :Te:, :Fe:, :Si: and :Ni: in their consciousness.
As you can see the extroverted dynamic types are rational, instead the extroverted static types are irrational; introverts, in this division, seem to mantain their sense: introverted dynamics are irrational while introverted statics are rational. But shouldn't all rational be static? In fact, in one of the few definitions of static/dynamic types I've found (Aushra) works the same concept that for rational/irrational... dynamic types are more P, static more J, so what up with that?
This is the umpteenth suggestion that there could be just 8 types instead of 16. If you remove the static/dynamic dichotomy you're left with the same quality of elements...
:Te:, :Se: = external objects
:Fe:, :Ne: = internal objects
:Ti:, :Si: = external fields
:Fi:, :Ni: = internal fields
etc.
What's the origin of this division?
I've been thinking of the use of this dichotomy lately, and the more I think about it the less I can make sense out of it. I haven't found much about its origin around, and given that it basically builds up the entire Model system, I'd be curious to gather something more out of it. Static/ Dynamic functions. Anyone got any ideas?
Just to try and reorganize the ideas a little: Static are the types that have either :Se:, :Ne:, :Ti: and :Fi: in their consciousness, dynamics are the types that use :Te:, :Fe:, :Si: and :Ni: in their consciousness.
As you can see the extroverted dynamic types are rational, instead the extroverted static types are irrational; introverts, in this division, seem to mantain their sense: introverted dynamics are irrational while introverted statics are rational. But shouldn't all rational be static? In fact, in one of the few definitions of static/dynamic types I've found (Aushra) works the same concept that for rational/irrational... dynamic types are more P, static more J, so what up with that?
This is the umpteenth suggestion that there could be just 8 types instead of 16. If you remove the static/dynamic dichotomy you're left with the same quality of elements...
:Te:, :Se: = external objects
:Fe:, :Ne: = internal objects
:Ti:, :Si: = external fields
:Fi:, :Ni: = internal fields
etc.
What's the origin of this division?