As instinct stackings come from enneasite.com, and its maker clearly knows nothing about Hindu philosophy, this isn't suspicious at all:
"The four stages of life complete the four human strivings in life, according to Hinduism.[67] Dharma enables the individual to satisfy the striving for stability and order, a life that is lawful and harmonious, the striving to do the right thing, be good, be virtuous, earn religious merit, be helpful to others, interact successfully with society. The other three strivings are Artha - the striving for means of life such as food, shelter, power, security, material wealth, etc.; Kama - the striving for sex, desire, pleasure, love, emotional fulfillment, etc.; and Moksa - the striving for spiritual meaning, liberation from life-rebirth cycle, self-realisation in this life, etc. The four stages are neither independent nor exclusionary in Hindu Dharma."
(from Wikipedia)
Hmm, So, Sp, and Sx don't sound like Dharma, Artha, and Kama, respectively. These also feel way more well-defined than how the instincts are usually defined as well. For example, Sx can just be defined as "intensity" and Sp as "dullness" often but I dare you to say that after you read pretty much any description of Sx 9 and Sp 4 side-by-side :/ Sp is also often sort of conflated with :Si: but Artha doesn't sound particularly :Si:-ish. These descriptions also makes it clearer why the synflow and contraflow stackings are that. So/Sx puts a person's emotional fulfillment and sex into society, but with Sx/So they're using society for emotional fulfillment and sex potentially to its harm (the second instinct being flexible and only used towards the first). With Sx/Sp you're using things to be emotionally fulfilled and have sex, but Sp/Sx you're using emotional fulfillment and sex to get things. Sp/So is using society to get money, power, shelter, etc. but So/Sp is using money, power, shelter, etc. to be social.
Any thoughts?
"The four stages of life complete the four human strivings in life, according to Hinduism.[67] Dharma enables the individual to satisfy the striving for stability and order, a life that is lawful and harmonious, the striving to do the right thing, be good, be virtuous, earn religious merit, be helpful to others, interact successfully with society. The other three strivings are Artha - the striving for means of life such as food, shelter, power, security, material wealth, etc.; Kama - the striving for sex, desire, pleasure, love, emotional fulfillment, etc.; and Moksa - the striving for spiritual meaning, liberation from life-rebirth cycle, self-realisation in this life, etc. The four stages are neither independent nor exclusionary in Hindu Dharma."
(from Wikipedia)
Hmm, So, Sp, and Sx don't sound like Dharma, Artha, and Kama, respectively. These also feel way more well-defined than how the instincts are usually defined as well. For example, Sx can just be defined as "intensity" and Sp as "dullness" often but I dare you to say that after you read pretty much any description of Sx 9 and Sp 4 side-by-side :/ Sp is also often sort of conflated with :Si: but Artha doesn't sound particularly :Si:-ish. These descriptions also makes it clearer why the synflow and contraflow stackings are that. So/Sx puts a person's emotional fulfillment and sex into society, but with Sx/So they're using society for emotional fulfillment and sex potentially to its harm (the second instinct being flexible and only used towards the first). With Sx/Sp you're using things to be emotionally fulfilled and have sex, but Sp/Sx you're using emotional fulfillment and sex to get things. Sp/So is using society to get money, power, shelter, etc. but So/Sp is using money, power, shelter, etc. to be social.
Any thoughts?