Ok so @niffer and I were having a discussion about LSI's :Ne: PoLR and how it relates to understanding and linking things together, as opposed to :Ti::
Because I can't believe we're seeing yet another :Ti: lead miss the point when it was very obvious and well explained in the first place. Like, it just isn't possible, what's their :Ti: for them, nitpicking on irrelevant mistakes? While deleting any evidence of their own glaring ones...Putting 1+1 together doesn't require :Ne:.
Since lack of :Ne: annoys me just as much as lack of :Ti:, and I had my EIE typing challenged in favor of SLE, I ask: SxEs of the forum, how does your :Ne: Role manifest?
Quote:
Because I can't believe we're seeing yet another :Ti: lead miss the point when it was very obvious and well explained in the first place. Like, it just isn't possible, what's their :Ti: for them, nitpicking on irrelevant mistakes? While deleting any evidence of their own glaring ones...Putting 1+1 together doesn't require :Ne:.
Quote:
Originally Posted by niffer
![View Post]()
Well the thing is... in a sense, it does. :Ne: polr makes you extremely averse to being willing to put 1+1 together on your own unless you have absolutely no other choice left. And even then you might not want to. You'd rather have someone else do it for you. But we'll save this discussion for a thread on :Ne: polr. :lol:
Since lack of :Ne: annoys me just as much as lack of :Ti:, and I had my EIE typing challenged in favor of SLE, I ask: SxEs of the forum, how does your :Ne: Role manifest?